Monday 10 November 2014

Papers – Dec 30st 2011
Pakistan’s febrile[1] politics
Open spats
The president returns—to a viper’s[2] nest partly of his own making
Dec 31st 2011 | ISLAMABAD | from the print edition
ON DECEMBER 19th the president of Pakistan, Asif Zardari, returned to the country after a two-week absence in Dubai. Officially, Mr Zardari had been getting treatment for a mild stroke.[3] But the belief was growing that the army was forcing him into exile.
For the time being, Mr Zardari’s return appears to have scotched[4] these rumours. Still, his troubles have not gone away. They include a scandal over a leaked memo that drew the president into an open spat[5] with the country’s military establishment; a political opposition pressing him hard for early elections; a dire[6] economy; and imploding[7] relations with the United States. Perhaps the mere survival of the government, led by Mr Zardari’s Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), for almost four years is a feat[8] of sorts.[9] But the government has achieved pitifully[10] little, while the ruling cabal[11] has lined its pockets[12] with gusto.[13]


[1] extremely active, or too excited, imaginative or emotional
[2] a small poisonous snake
[3] a sudden serious illness when a blood vessel (= tube) in the brain bursts or is blocked, which can cause death or the loss of the ability to move or to speak clearly
[4] stop something from happening
[5] a short argument or disagreement about something unimportant
[6] very serious or extreme
[7] fail suddenly and completely
[8] an action or a piece of work that needs skill, strength or courage
[9] used when you are saying that something is not a good example of a particular type of thing
[10] not deserving respect; poor
[11] a small group of people who are involved in secret plans to get political power
[12] get richer or make somebody richer, especially by taking unfair advantage of a situation or by being dishonest
[13] enthusiasm and energy in doing something

With the president determined to hang on,[1] the armed forces, which seem incapable of staying out of politics, have a problem. They want to be rid of Mr Zardari, but they do not want to stage another coup. Nor do they want to see the opposition leader, Nawaz Sharif, come to power, since they do not trust him.
Mr Zardari knows that if he tries to sack the army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, then he may well get the coup he fears. Mr Sharif, meanwhile, wants to force[2] elections (not due until February 2013) without playing into the hands of the generals. There is what Cyril Almeida, a columnist, describes as a Mexican standoff.[3]
The opposition lacks the numbers in parliament to impeach[4] Mr Zardari. And so the action has moved to the courts in looking for grounds on which to pursue[5] him, even though it is unclear how a sitting president’s constitutional immunity[6] from prosecution[7] might be circumvented.[8]
After the president’s return from Dubai, his prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, spoke openly of coup fears for the first time, claiming that “conspiracies are being hatched[9] here to pack up[10] the elected government”; the army should not act as a “state within the state”.


[1] continue doing something in difficult circumstances
[2] make somebody do something that they do not want to do; compel
[3] a Mexican standoff is most precisely a confrontation between three opponents, facing each other; a situation in which no one can emerge as a clear winner
[4] charge an important public figure with a serious crime
[5] follow or chase somebody/something, especially in order to catch them
[6] the state of being protected from something
[7] the process of trying to prove in court that somebody is guilty of a crime (= of prosecuting them)
[8] find a way of avoiding a difficulty or a rule
[9] create a plan or an idea, especially in secret
[10] stop working

The army’s tactic[1] appears to be to apply pressure until Mr Zardari snaps,[2] or at least to weaken his government so that it can merely limp on until a more agreeable administration can somehow be installed.[3] At the heart of the current coercion is a labyrinthine[4] scandal in which the government is accused of plotting against its own armed forces, by making a “treacherous[5] offer to the United States that took the form of a mysterious memo. These days in Pakistan, America is regarded more as an enemy than as the ally it is supposed to be.
The anonymous memo was delivered in May to America’s top brass.[6] It offered to rein in Pakistan’s armed forces in return for more robust[7] American support for the civilian government. The messenger was a Pakistani-American businessman, Mansoor Ijaz. He claimed to be acting on the instructions of Pakistan’s then ambassador to Washington, DC, Husain Haqqani.
In November Mr Haqqani, who was close to Mr Zardari, was fired over the claims, which he denies. Pakistan’s activist[8] Supreme Court has taken up “Memogate”. Although the government has asked the court to dismiss the “non-issue”, the army demands that the judges investigate the matter fully. On December 27th, the fourth anniversary of the death of his wife, Benazir Bhutto, Mr Zardari demanded to know why the courts hounding[9] him were not going after the assassins instead.


[1] the particular method you use to achieve something
[2] speak or say something in an impatient, usually angry, voice
[3] put somebody in a new position of authority, often with an official ceremony
[4] complex; complicated; a complicated series of paths, which it is difficult to find your way through

[5] intending to harm you; deceitful

[6] the people who are in the most important positions in a company, an organization, etc.
[7] strong and not likely to fail or become weak
[8] someone who works hard doing practical things to achieve social or political change
[9] keep following somebody and not leave them alone, especially in order to get something from them or ask them questions; harass

Memogate is also about Pakistan’s troubled alliance with America, one that seems unlikely to recover from body blows it has received in the past year. The latest was a “friendly-fire[1] assault by American helicopters on a Pakistani border post with Afghanistan, in which two-dozen Pakistani soldiers were killed. Americans are coming to terms with the fact that a broad, decade-long security relationship with Pakistan, seen as essential to producing stability in Afghanistan, is coming to a close with little to show for it.
Into all this has charged[2] a cricketer-turned-politician. Imran Khan has spent 15 years in the political wilderness, but in the past few months he has gained huge momentum.[3] On December 25th Mr Khan staged the second blockbuster[4] rally in as many months, in the volatile[5] city of Karachi. He is riding high[6] on an anti-corruption and anti-American agenda. Many believe that the army would like to see Mr Khan come to power, and that it may be providing him with help. In recent weeks Mr Khan has gathered around him a gang of army-friendly defectors[7] from other political parties. Chalk up[8] one more challenge for Mr Zardari.


[1] in a war, if people are killed or injured by friendly fire, they are hit by a bomb or weapon that is fired by their own side
[2] rush forward and attack somebody/something
[3] the ability to keep increasing or developing
[4] something very successful, especially a very successful book or film/movie
[5] likely to change suddenly; easily becoming dangerous; unstable
[6] be successful or very confident
[7] rebel; apostate; deserter; a person who has defected
[8] achieve or record a success, points in a game, etc

No comments:

Post a Comment

1. Fill in the blanks with suitable words. 1. p erformed 2. consummate 3. revered 4. irrevocably 5. legislation 6. professionals 7. p...